As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
1 day ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Weapons (Blu-ray)
$22.95
12 hrs ago
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$45.00
18 min ago
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.99
8 hrs ago
The Good, the Bad, the Weird 4K (Blu-ray)
$41.99
4 hrs ago
Burden of Dreams 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
10 hrs ago
Samurai Fury 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.96
6 hrs ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$101.99
1 day ago
Avengers: Endgame (Blu-ray)
$7.00
2 hrs ago
Elio (Blu-ray)
$24.89
6 hrs ago
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


View Poll Results: Which version of Star Wars Blu-ray will you be purchasing (or not)?
The Complete Star Wars Saga 1,335 72.48%
The Prequel Box Set 20 1.09%
The Original Trilogy Box Set 110 5.97%
Not Purchasing Star Wars Blu-ray 377 20.47%
Voters: 1842. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2019, 11:09 PM   #66521
MrVorhees MrVorhees is offline
Special Member
 
MrVorhees's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Castle Grayskull
2
572
2
Default

For me:
All new Star Wars movies are dog shit. They actually managed for me to not care about Star Wars anymore.
TFA was the least shittiest though.

The positive thing is, this makes me appreciate the prequels even more.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
drak b (02-19-2019), Krypton_Son (02-19-2019), skreemingskulll (02-18-2019)
Old 02-18-2019, 11:11 PM   #66522
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is offline
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2372
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StingingVelvet View Post
Disney Star Wars movies ranked:

1) Solo
2) Rogue One
3) Force Awakens
4) Last Jedi
1) Rogue One | Solo
2) The Force Awakens
3) The Last Jedi
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
frogmort (02-18-2019), RancorKeeper (02-20-2019)
Old 02-18-2019, 11:30 PM   #66523
Allgood Allgood is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Allgood's Avatar
 
Dec 2014
49
44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVorhees View Post
For me:
All new Star Wars movies are dog shit. They actually managed for me to not care about Star Wars anymore.
TFA was the least shittiest though.

The positive thing is, this makes me appreciate the prequels even more.
The prequels were shit too. stop kidding yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Dynamo of Eternia (02-19-2019), oilers73 (02-19-2019), StingingVelvet (02-19-2019), svenge (02-19-2019), Weirded Wonder (02-18-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 12:05 AM   #66524
HarcourtMudd HarcourtMudd is offline
Senior Member
 
HarcourtMudd's Avatar
 
Oct 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alister_M View Post
It's the same audio in both channels.

If you're running it through a [discrete] surround system, a 1.0 mono track will output sound from the centre speaker, while 2.0 mono will output from the left/right front speakers. That will give you a more immersive mono sound, while 1.0 is more centralized. If it's being run through a 2-speaker system like a TV, 1.0 will basically be spread across the two channels so it ends up being 2.0 mono.
Based on my (pedestrian) understanding of Pro-Logic decoding (I have no idea if this applies to the DTS variants), the parts of the left and right channels that are duplicated are subtracted from the respective channel and re-directed to the center. So, if you have a true 2.0 mono signal, everything being duplicated between the two channels, all would be re-directed to the center channel. At least this is how my system behaves. Now, if the surround system is true discrete (ie. 5.1, 7.1, etc), then a 2.0 mono signal would indeed be sent to both left and right...
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 12:10 AM   #66525
Matt Murdock Matt Murdock is offline
Senior Member
 
Matt Murdock's Avatar
 
Nov 2015
2
31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frogjunk65 View Post
I’m tired of people saying TLJ is going to be remembered like Empire. I’ll eat my hat in 20 years if it does reach that status.
If that happens, it'll happen in the months following IX's release, if it does it's job the whole trilogy will be reexamined.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 12:59 AM   #66526
frogjunk65 frogjunk65 is offline
Senior Member
 
frogjunk65's Avatar
 
Sep 2009
An Island
30
714
144
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Murdock View Post
If that happens, it'll happen in the months following IX's release, if it does it's job the whole trilogy will be reexamined.
I don’t think it will happen. Like I said earlier this ST is for a new generation. No one’s forcing me to like it or watch it again.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
oilers73 (02-19-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 01:01 AM   #66527
imsounoriginal imsounoriginal is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
imsounoriginal's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
NYC
320
946
70
2
59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StingingVelvet View Post
Disney Star Wars movies ranked:

1) Solo
2) Rogue One
3) Force Awakens
4) Last Jedi
1. Solo
2. The Last Jedi
3. The Force Awakens
4. Rogue One
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Gacivory (02-19-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 01:15 AM   #66528
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarcourtMudd View Post
Based on my (pedestrian) understanding of Pro-Logic decoding (I have no idea if this applies to the DTS variants), the parts of the left and right channels that are duplicated are subtracted from the respective channel and re-directed to the center. So, if you have a true 2.0 mono signal, everything being duplicated between the two channels, all would be re-directed to the center channel. At least this is how my system behaves. Now, if the surround system is true discrete (ie. 5.1, 7.1, etc), then a 2.0 mono signal would indeed be sent to both left and right...
If you're actually applying a particular surround DSP to a dual mono track then yes, it should collapse into the discrete centre channel. But if you turn that off and output the audio 'as is' then it should come from front left and right only, converging in the 'sweet spot' as a phantom centre channel.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
HarcourtMudd (02-19-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 01:33 AM   #66529
Arawn Arawn is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Arawn's Avatar
 
Jul 2015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frogjunk65 View Post
I’m tired of people saying TLJ is going to be remembered like Empire.
When people say that just go like this:

  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
frogjunk65 (02-20-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 01:36 AM   #66530
HarcourtMudd HarcourtMudd is offline
Senior Member
 
HarcourtMudd's Avatar
 
Oct 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
If you're actually applying a particular surround DSP to a dual mono track then yes, it should collapse into the discrete centre channel. But if you turn that off and output the audio 'as is' then it should come from front left and right only, converging in the 'sweet spot' as a phantom centre channel.
Thank you for the clarification...
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 02:31 AM   #66531
motorheadache95 motorheadache95 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
motorheadache95's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Default

I still love The Force Awakens-- I liked the new cast and them running around with old man Han Solo. Surprisingly, I really liked Ron Howard's Solo film as well.

A distant third is Rogue One-- I never liked it as much as a lot of people. It feels like a compromised story that doesn't come together that well until the fantastic climax.

Last Jedi? It's okay. I like the main plot and not so much the Casino subplot.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 02:57 AM   #66532
StingingVelvet StingingVelvet is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
StingingVelvet's Avatar
 
Jan 2014
Philadelphia, PA
851
2331
111
12
69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allgood View Post
The prequels were shit too. stop kidding yourself.
Yeah, I don't think the Disney movies are anything amazing but talk about them killing Star Wars makes me laugh my ass off considering what came the decade before.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 03:33 AM   #66533
ImBlu_DaBaDee ImBlu_DaBaDee is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
ImBlu_DaBaDee's Avatar
 
Nov 2018
264
431
30
Default

1. The Last Jedi
2. The Force Awakens
3. Rogue One






4. Solo
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Dynamo of Eternia (02-19-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 01:36 PM   #66534
MrVorhees MrVorhees is offline
Special Member
 
MrVorhees's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Castle Grayskull
2
572
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allgood View Post
The prequels were shit too. stop kidding yourself.
No they are not. They are ok movies. But it's the 'internet cool' to claim they are shit. Go ahead, say the prequels are shit because of JarJar Bings only Same bandwagon hate with the band U2. It's more a meme.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 01:46 PM   #66535
Krypton_Son Krypton_Son is offline
Senior Member
 
Krypton_Son's Avatar
 
Jun 2017
Somwhere out there
19
527
88
1
Default

Personally I can't stand any of the Disney SW movies except Rogue One. I'm 50/50 on the PT. I'm a OT fan. But to each their own. I get sick of people calling out someone who liked or didn't like certain ones. If you like the ST that's cool. I don't, but there's no reason I would think less of you if you do.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 02:17 PM   #66536
Caseyscott Caseyscott is offline
Expert Member
 
Jul 2016
Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan
273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVorhees View Post
No they are not. They are ok movies. But it's the 'internet cool' to claim they are shit. Go ahead, say the prequels are shit because of JarJar Bings only Same bandwagon hate with the band U2. It's more a meme.
A well articulated defense of the prequel’s shortcomings can be constructed free from fluctuating trends of the Internet. Your analysis is equally as vapid as the ones you are challenging.

Last edited by Caseyscott; 02-19-2019 at 02:35 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Krypton_Son (02-19-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 02:25 PM   #66537
njdevil254 njdevil254 is offline
Active Member
 
njdevil254's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
Williamstown, NJ
77
776
288
607
147
79
18
Default

I am and always will be a huge fan of the original trilogy and have spent countless hours downloading the latest attempts at recreating the originals, as I find the "special editions" and the various changes to be pointless plastic surgery to masterpieces that were already beautiful.

The prequels were okay, but nowhere near the originals in story or characters. There was a week or so after each was released in theaters where I may have liked or even loved them, as they were the first Star Wars movies we had gotten in 16 years. As time went on, the nostalgia wore off, and what remained we're just okay movies that didn't live up to the legacy.

The sequel trilogy started off well enough, as episode VII was a very entertaining movie. It did feel like a rehash of the movies that came before, but I had fun with it. The characters were good, and Harrison Ford was definitely still the Handle Solo that we all grew up loving. Disney maybe made it too safe, and used what we loved about the originals to make an almost shot for shot remake remake of a a New Hope. There was still enough mystery with the new characters to keep me interested in future installments.

Then episode VIII happened... It was honestly the first Star Wars movie that I walked out of the theater not thrilled about. I echo many of the complaints that people had with the movie, such as Snoke, Fin and Rose's pointless trip to the casino, and Rey's parents. What bothered me the most was the film's treatment of Luke Skywalker. I understand that the director wanted to throw curve balls to mess with our expectations, but he did so at the cost of all of the strong characterization built up before he took over. Luke is literally nothing like the character that I grew up watching. I feel like Johnson went out of his way to do the opposite of everything that fans expected just for shock value. Hopefully Abrams can close out the trilogy strong, but he's cleaning up quite a mess.

Rouge One and Solo to me are just forgettable. RO is the better of the two movies to me, but I don't really feel like either movie truly needed to be made. I didn't care about the characters in either movie. Solo was just unnecessary. They both ended up being watchable, but forgettable and ultimately pointless at the same time. Just some thoughts from an old Star Wars fanatic.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Krypton_Son (02-19-2019), RancorKeeper (02-20-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 03:04 PM   #66538
Dynamo of Eternia Dynamo of Eternia is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Dynamo of Eternia's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
335
1857
1573
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njdevil254 View Post
What bothered me the most was the film's treatment of Luke Skywalker. I understand that the director wanted to throw curve balls to mess with our expectations, but he did so at the cost of all of the strong characterization built up before he took over. Luke is literally nothing like the character that I grew up watching. I feel like Johnson went out of his way to do the opposite of everything that fans expected just for shock value. Hopefully Abrams can close out the trilogy strong, but he's cleaning up quite a mess.
I know that I'm in the relative minority in that, while I admit that it was not a perfect film, I did like The Last Jedi overall, and if ranking all of the movies from best to worse in my opinion, the original OT films would be in the top 3 spots, with TLJ being in 4th place above the rest.



I won't overly rehash the issues with the prequels, but between the very bad direction that led to stiff performances from actors who have had great roles in other films, some things barely lining up with the OT by a weak thread, and the introduction and character development of the characters new to the prequels often being handled terribly (we never hear of Dooku until Ep 2 and he doesn't actually appear until about half way into the movie, in Ep 3 suddenly General Grievous is an important character that we had never heard of before in the films), there was just a lot going on there that didn't work well IMO.

With The Force Awakens, it was IMO too much of a rehash of A New Hope. I felt that way about it from my first time seeing it. However, while that was an issue, I did actually like the new characters, particularly Rey, Finn, and Poe. They were well handled and acted. The Disney era films, for the most part, seem to mostly get right what the prequels got wrong, but also get wrong what little the prequels got right.


After the disappointing prequels, which it was hard to not have at least some basic expectations of going into them since they were the back story of the films that we already saw, the thing that I was looking forward to the most about a sequel trilogy was it being an "open book" or "blank canvas" so to speak. Within reason, they can go in pretty much any direction. And what I wanted most was to be surprised.


For the most part, that it was The Last Jedi did in my opinion. On my first viewing, the movie definitely starts out slow. A lot of the time with Rey on the island with Luke does tend to drag. But once we get past that and things really get going, I loved most of what happened. I was thrilled that they went in a lot of unexpected directions. People get upset about Snoke dying because we didn't know much about him. But just because he is dead doesn't mean that we can't learn more about his backstory in the next film. And what is there really to tell? In the original trilogy, we really didn't know much about the Emperor. People only seem to be concerned about knowing more about Snoke because we got Palpatine's backstory in the prequels, but even that can be summarized as him being a politician who manipulated the in universe politics to allow him to become the Emperor.

Snoke may have rose to power in more or less a similar manner, or at least one that can be just as easily summarized. The only real difference between Snoke's death and the Emperor's death (and how much we knew about them at the time of the releases of those respective films) is that Snoke's happens roughly in the middle of the second movie of the sequel trilogy, while the Emperor's happens towards the end of the third film in the original trilogy.


As for Luke, I'm of two minds about how he is handled. On the one hand, I do understand, up to a point, people being disappointed in how he was handled and wanting him to be more heroic. At the same time, I think in many respects how he was handled here actually makes a lot of sense. The only part that I really had an issue with was him throwing away his/his father's old light saber that Rey hands him with it being played off for laughs. Regardless of how much he may want to keep certain things in the past, I would think that suddenly having that show up after he lost is roughly 30+ years beforehand would have made him wonder how she got it.


But in terms of his overall attitude and characterization, I get it. And I think the main reasoning for it is summed up in when he talks about the dogmatic ways of the Jedi, how that essentially allowed for Palpatine/Sidious/The Emperor to emerge into power, etc.

In a sense, the events of the prequels are in large part what effects Luke's views. In the original trilogy, while he learns the ways of the Jedi (i.e. using the force, handling a light saber), he really only gets a very basic, minimalistic, and in some ways inaccurate history of the Jedi order.

In the OT, the Jedi are built up as being this heroic group that was brought down by betrayal and evil... which is true from a certain point of view. But it really makes it sound like the were this almost perfectly heroic group that went down fighting, but were just largely overpowered by the opposition.

In reality, the Jedi as a whole don't really come off looking all that great in the prequels. They ARE very dogmatic. They rely on the force to a fault, despite the dark side "clouding everything," and fail to see what basic non-force-based logic and deductive reasoning easily should have revealed to them. They are so caught up in their ways that it is more so to their detriment. In the OT, Obi Wan described Anakin as a good friend, etc. But even once we see him as an adult in Episode 2, from the get-go he is an arrogant a-hole. There are very few hints of this great friendship that they shared. And while Anakin is overly hot headed and should learn to follow instruction better, at the same time the Jedi's dogmatic ways (i.e. not allowing a Jedi to have a romantic relationship) force him to hide his relationship with Padme and actually helps his decent to the dark side since he can't really be open and honest about his relationship and rely on the Jedi to help him through these feelings rather than just forbidding them.


We, as the audience, found out this information after the OT because the PT was released afterwards. Luke, similarly, learned about most of these details after the events of the OT. In essence, Luke hates the prequels (or more accurately the events that transpired during them and how the Jedi come across overall). In many respects his stance and attitude makes sense given how those films played out.

He tried to create a new Jedi order, and when he found that his nephew seemed to have the dark side in him, it made him want to let the Jedi order just end. Honestly given the info that he came to know in the time between the OT and TLJ, this in some ways makes more sense than him just being a near perfect hero who will just show up with a laser sword and save the day.



My biggest issues with the two sequels so far (beyond TFA being a rehash of ANH) is that with Rey, Finn, and Poe more or less being the new Luke, Han, and Leia, they are never all together it seems, and Poe doesn't formally meet Rey until the end of TLJ. The other issue is that while I didn't completely hate Rose's character, the part where she stops Finn from sacrificing himself to save everyone else and says that we have to save what we love was stupid because he was trying to save everyone else.

While the Finn and Rose subplot (beyond keeping him separated from Rey, etc.) didn't go to plan, the fact that it didn't go to plan didn't really bother me. Not everything will work out as intended. But there are still things about that which could have been handled better.

Last edited by Dynamo of Eternia; 02-19-2019 at 06:18 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
phlyle11 (02-19-2019), RancorKeeper (02-20-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 03:21 PM   #66539
StingingVelvet StingingVelvet is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
StingingVelvet's Avatar
 
Jan 2014
Philadelphia, PA
851
2331
111
12
69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVorhees View Post
No they are not. They are ok movies. But it's the 'internet cool' to claim they are shit. Go ahead, say the prequels are shit because of JarJar Bings only Same bandwagon hate with the band U2. It's more a meme.
Or maybe, just maybe, many people dislike preschool level writing, bad acting and overdone CGI effects.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Dynamo of Eternia (02-19-2019), frogjunk65 (02-20-2019), Geoff D (02-19-2019), LarryT (02-19-2019), PrivatePixel (02-19-2019), solaris72 (02-19-2019)
Old 02-19-2019, 03:26 PM   #66540
Dailyan Dailyan is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
Dailyan's Avatar
 
Feb 2015
Beyond the Blue Horizon
195
2245
197
58
55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StingingVelvet View Post
Or maybe, just maybe, many people dislike preschool level writing, bad acting and overdone CGI effects.
I don't like the prequels. They're coarse, rough, irritating, and they get everywhere.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Dynamo of Eternia (02-20-2019), Gacivory (02-19-2019), hanshotfirst1138 (02-20-2019), LRSVDR (02-20-2019), shinobipopcorn (02-19-2019), StingingVelvet (02-19-2019)
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Star Trek box set 1-10 Blu-ray Movies - International koontz1973 13 03-03-2015 12:52 PM
New STAR WARS box set (on DVD only) General Chat Blu-Ron 40 08-03-2011 03:47 PM
Any Idea when all 6 Star Wars will be released? Possibly 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America devils_syndicate 445 08-15-2010 11:52 AM
Star Wars (BD Movies) Release Planned for 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America kemcha 5 04-25-2010 03:29 AM
Star Wars CLONE WARS Blu-Ray Exclusive 2 Disc GIFT SET + Comic Book Blu-ray Movies - North America little flower 10 11-11-2009 10:35 PM

Tags
ford, george, lucas, star wars, vader


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 PM.