As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Happy Gilmore 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
9 hrs ago
Creepshow: Complete Series - Seasons 1-4 (Blu-ray)
$68.47
12 hrs ago
Clue 4K (Blu-ray)
$26.59
4 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
The Last Drive-In With Joe Bob Briggs (Blu-ray)
$14.49
12 hrs ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
Shane 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
11 hrs ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2007, 04:34 PM   #1
Petey Pablo Petey Pablo is offline
Member
 
Petey Pablo's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Default Studio exclusivity deals?

I was just thinking about the exclusive titles that were release on HDDVD from WB and wanted to know exactly if this was a back room deal or not? If it was that is kinda crappy to have a studio like WB, a BDA board member release great titles exclusive to HDDVD. It just calls in to question their true loyalty. Has there been any true known fact as to the leangth of Universal's exclusivity deal and the likely hood of them going neutral or Blu-ray exclusive by the end of the 4Q?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 04:37 PM   #2
glenn22 glenn22 is offline
Power Member
 
glenn22's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Vancouver, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey Pablo View Post
I was just thinking about the exclusive titles that were release on HDDVD from WB and wanted to know exactly if this was a back room deal or not? If it was that is kinda crappy to have a studio like WB, a BDA board member release great titles exclusive to HDDVD. It just calls in to question their true loyalty. Has there been any true known fact as to the leangth of Universal's exclusivity deal and the likely hood of them going neutral or Blu-ray exclusive by the end of the 4Q?
A lot of people feel that the reason Warner released a lot of movies on HD-DVD that weren't also released on Blu-ray had a lot to do with Mr. Nickerson being in charge there. He was very much pro-HD-DVD and used to work for Toshiba. He has since resigned (no one knows if he was forced or not) and since then Warner seems to have warmed up to Blu-ray a lot.

The Universal thing has never really been confirmed in any way. Execs from Universal have been sniffing around Blu-ray facilities for quite a while, so there is interest, but impossible to say if that will turn into anything or not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 05:21 PM   #3
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenn22 View Post
A lot of people feel that the reason Warner released a lot of movies on HD-DVD that weren't also released on Blu-ray had a lot to do with Mr. Nickerson being in charge there. He was very much pro-HD-DVD and used to work for Toshiba. He has since resigned (no one knows if he was forced or not) and since then Warner seems to have warmed up to Blu-ray a lot.
I personally believe the order was reversed. I believe Warner warmed to Blu and Nickerson left becuase of it OR was asked to leave.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 08:16 PM   #4
TorpedoShockwave TorpedoShockwave is offline
Banned
 
TorpedoShockwave's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Chicago, IL
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenn22 View Post
A lot of people feel that the reason Warner released a lot of movies on HD-DVD that weren't also released on Blu-ray had a lot to do with Mr. Nickerson being in charge there. He was very much pro-HD-DVD and used to work for Toshiba. He has since resigned (no one knows if he was forced or not) and since then Warner seems to have warmed up to Blu-ray a lot.

The Universal thing has never really been confirmed in any way. Execs from Universal have been sniffing around Blu-ray facilities for quite a while, so there is interest, but impossible to say if that will turn into anything or not.
You are somewhat correct; also WB stated Blu-Ray came out before it was fully completed, premature birth. For example, no PIP support, no BD Live support, early players had BD Java problems, and no true DTS HD MA support. WB was waiting for at least spec 1.1 (BD-PIP support) to be finalized and 2.0 (BD-Live) not mentioned.

However, I could care less; I have many collector/special editions of games and movies. As I can recall I had never even used any of the bonus contents. For example, POTC movies had special BD-J features and I had not even click on the bonus menu. To me the big deal is the feature film, not the extra contents.

All these bonus features hurt us in the long run, it increases the cost, and in this HD war, it brings HD-DVD trolls to BD forms.

In conclusion, it was bogus of WB to exclude certain films on BD, considering the main purpose is to watch the film, not enjoy the bonus features. Mater of fact the bonus features hurt sales; all the HD-DVD counterparts are more expensive.

Well done WB, great plan, make HD-DVDs cost more then BD therefore it can stun the HD-DVD sales.

Last edited by TorpedoShockwave; 09-13-2007 at 08:31 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 08:31 PM   #5
Proteus Proteus is offline
Power Member
 
Proteus's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
SoCal PSN:CaptBurn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpedoShockwave View Post
However, I could care less; I have many collector/special editions of games and movies. As I can recall I had never even used any of the bonus contents. For example, POTC movies had special BD-J features and I had not even click on the bonus menu. To me the big deal is the feature film, not the extra contents.

I have to admit I did use a bonus feature from a Collector's Edition once.

It was World of Warcraft. I whipped out that little pet you get with the Collector's Edition a couple times when I was still playing it. People would say, 'Oh! You have the Collector's Edition!', then never speak to me again because of the jealousy and envy they felt about not having that little pet as well. Kind of the story of World of Dramacraft.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 08:59 PM   #6
blu-rayfan101 blu-rayfan101 is offline
Expert Member
 
blu-rayfan101's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
The Universe.
Default

I think WB will release the movies that are only on hd dvd right now because they have it on their website listed as upcoming releases. Second when all the blu-ray features are ready and out i think WB will releasae them.
When Universals contract runs out i think they will want more money and if Toshiba doesnt give them money they will go neutral then Universal might want money to stay neutral or go blu exclusive. But in the end if WB releases their make-up titles or Universal go neutral that will be a big score for blu-ray, and if both happens then SCORE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2007, 02:15 AM   #7
HK-48 HK-48 is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

I bet after the contract is up, Universal will go neutral unless M$ and To$hiba get out the checkbook. I hope though, that they won't give Universal the money. I agree with how Paramount was chosen because To$hiba wasn't sure if Universal would want to continue. Plus Paramount was the most successful studio during the summer unfortunately. I hope they bomb next year. Universal got 5th place, Sony got 4th, Disney got 3rd, Warner got 2nd, and Fox got 6th.

Here is what I hope will happen: Universal will go neutral and cite crappy HD DEAD sales and Blu-Ray popularity/PS3 as their reasons. Then Sony, Disney, Fox, and all the Blu-Ray Disc Association's Board of Directors come up with a nice sum of cash to hand over to Universal and BAM, Universal goes Blu-Ray exclusive. Vivendi probably wants them to go Blu-Ray excluisve, since Universal Music Group, which is owned by Vivendi, only supports Blu-Ray.

I know this is wishful thinking, but it could happen. It seems both sides have been trying to get Warner exclusively on their side, but Warner is letting the consumer decide. IThey will go Blu-Ray exlcusive if everything keeps going like this, unless Harry Potter and all their other movies sell like a million on HD DEAD and none on Blu-Ray.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 04:47 PM   #8
jermwhl jermwhl is offline
Special Member
 
jermwhl's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Virginia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey Pablo View Post
I was just thinking about the exclusive titles that were release on HDDVD from WB and wanted to know exactly if this was a back room deal or not? If it was that is kinda crappy to have a studio like WB, a BDA board member release great titles exclusive to HDDVD. It just calls in to question their true loyalty. Has there been any true known fact as to the leangth of Universal's exclusivity deal and the likely hood of them going neutral or Blu-ray exclusive by the end of the 4Q?
which titles are you referring to?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 04:51 PM   #9
WickyWoo WickyWoo is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
May 2007
2
Default

There's 25 titles the vast majority of which are still unnannounced on Blu-Ray

There was definately something changing hands on those titles, but those deals are reportedly only for a year, so expect to see them trickle out over the next year

Quote:
Universal is schizo if you ask me. The Universal Music Group is a member of the BDA but their movie division is hd-dud. Makes no sense to me.
Universal Music was retailed by Vivendi, same name, totally diff company
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 04:54 PM   #10
Petey Pablo Petey Pablo is offline
Member
 
Petey Pablo's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WickyWoo View Post
There's 25 titles the vast majority of which are still unnannounced on Blu-Ray

There was definately something changing hands on those titles, but those deals are reportedly only for a year, so expect to see them trickle out over the next year



Universal Music was retailed by Vivendi, same name, totally diff company
Wouldn't there be some sort of cold shoulder given by the rest of the BDA to WB for those kind of actions based on their place they hold as Board member?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2007, 09:45 AM   #11
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1161
7056
4063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WickyWoo View Post
There's 25 titles the vast majority of which are still unnannounced on Blu-Ray
There's 22 now (21 movies + 1 TV season)
(and with Polar Express' announced date, that's down to 21 total)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 04:56 PM   #12
Petey Pablo Petey Pablo is offline
Member
 
Petey Pablo's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jermwhl View Post
which titles are you referring to?
Just like Batman Begin, and The Matrix ect..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 05:45 PM   #13
jermwhl jermwhl is offline
Special Member
 
jermwhl's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Virginia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey Pablo View Post
Just like Batman Begin, and The Matrix ect..
They technically aren't exclusive titles, they just haven't been released on BD...yet. They are coming eventually. Hopefully sooner than later.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 04:50 PM   #14
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey Pablo View Post
I was just thinking about the exclusive titles that were release on HDDVD from WB and wanted to know exactly if this was a back room deal or not? If it was that is kinda crappy to have a studio like WB, a BDA board member release great titles exclusive to HDDVD. It just calls in to question their true loyalty. Has there been any true known fact as to the leangth of Universal's exclusivity deal and the likely hood of them going neutral or Blu-ray exclusive by the end of the 4Q?
Universal is schizo if you ask me. The Universal Music Group is a member of the BDA but their movie division is hd-dud. Makes no sense to me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 05:31 PM   #15
Sir Terrence Sir Terrence is offline
Sound Insider/M.P.S.E.
 
Sir Terrence's Avatar
 
Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey Pablo View Post
I was just thinking about the exclusive titles that were release on HDDVD from WB and wanted to know exactly if this was a back room deal or not? If it was that is kinda crappy to have a studio like WB, a BDA board member release great titles exclusive to HDDVD. It just calls in to question their true loyalty. Has there been any true known fact as to the leangth of Universal's exclusivity deal and the likely hood of them going neutral or Blu-ray exclusive by the end of the 4Q?
No this was not a backroom situation. Because HD DVD has all of its standards set, WB was able to do all of the extra's the way the wanted to do them. Bluray specifications were not complete, and WB did not want to do unequal releases on both formats, the wanted them to be the same. Once Bluray's standards are finalized, you see those titles released with the same extra's as the HD DVD.

You will probably not hear about any news about anything with Universal until later this year. I highly doubt they will go exclusive, they will most likely go neutral. We'll have to see.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 05:35 PM   #16
WickyWoo WickyWoo is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
May 2007
2
Default

Quote:
No this was not a backroom situation. Because HD DVD has all of its standards set, WB was able to do all of the extra's the way the wanted to do them. Bluray specifications were not complete, and WB did not want to do unequal releases on both formats, the wanted them to be the same. Once Bluray's standards are finalized, you see those titles released with the same extra's as the HD DVD.
Only a handful of those titles have IME. While that arguement may be there for Batman, V, or Charlie, it's certainly not valid for Robin Hood, Casablanca or Perfect Storm
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 09:12 PM   #17
oneaaron oneaaron is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WickyWoo View Post
Only a handful of those titles have IME. While that arguement may be there for Batman, V, or Charlie, it's certainly not valid for Robin Hood, Casablanca or Perfect Storm
Sure it is! have you seen Casablanca HD DVD if you have then you would know that it's valid...
Batman Begins, Constantine, Troy,
V for Vendetta, Perfect Storm,
Poseidon, Terminator 3,
and The Matrix Trilogy.
WB will release these movie on blu-ray sooner or later....
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 09:04 AM   #18
richard lichtenfelt richard lichtenfelt is offline
Power Member
 
richard lichtenfelt's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
I'm not drunk, I'm just tired cause I been up all night drinking.
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oneaaron View Post
Sure it is! have you seen Casablanca HD DVD if you have then you would know that it's valid...
Batman Begins, Constantine, Troy,
V for Vendetta, Perfect Storm,
Poseidon, Terminator 3,
and The Matrix Trilogy.
WB will release these movie on blu-ray sooner or later....
I'm trying just to find one blu-ray positive post by you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 10:38 AM   #19
Papi4baby Papi4baby is offline
Special Member
 
Papi4baby's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
That man from Nantucket
32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard lichtenfelt View Post
I'm trying just to find one blu-ray positive post by you.
Sickem boy sickem out.

On a side note reviving old threads, look we now have Troy, i guess slowly but surely we will have the WB HDDVD only tittles.

Guys remember what the insider said once, Universal seems to have made the bed with HDDVD and aparently dont plan to get out of it. Also this contract thing is just speculation, nobody knows anything except top people and they aren't talking.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:47 PM   #20
oneaaron oneaaron is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard lichtenfelt View Post
I'm trying just to find one blu-ray positive post by you.
This was a positive thing I said!
WB will release these movies on blu-ray sooner or later.... and you know why I said it. Because I believe to be true. I'm not a fan boy like you are I call it like I see it. Right now blu-ray has better sound and HD DVD has better features that's the facts! Live with it.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Studio 40s vs. Studio 20s Speakers Husker43 11 07-23-2009 03:38 AM
List of studio/distributor/retailer Blu-ray exclusivity announcements Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology mhussung 62 02-18-2008 08:27 PM
WB Foreshadowed Exclusivity? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Petra_Kalbrain 16 01-16-2008 04:43 PM
Studio exclusivity in prior format wars? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Texitura 9 11-21-2007 11:31 AM
Movie series split up by format war/studio exclusivity Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology cruzzer cruz 23 08-27-2007 03:38 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 PM.