|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.13 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.57 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $29.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.50 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Mar 2008
|
![]()
I got my J&R clearance shipment today, and I heard a sound that would normally make me sigh, overwhelmed with that impending feeling of frustration and depression.
Yes, the rattle- the sound that the movie case makes when the disc has become loose. I opened up the box (T2 for those wondering) and smiled; the disc was scratchless. There would be no need for a return or wait. I immediately popped in the movie and started watching. I've also recently bought more used Blus because of this feature, and I no longer worry about buying used games when I don't care whether or not the publisher gets money from my purchase (EA). |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Moderator
|
![]()
I look at some of my DVDs that have a LOT of small scratches, and they play fine, but I have one disc of Sopranos (around season 3 or so) that gets "glitchy" and pixelated...... I wish they had the coating, they'd all be perfect still!!! I certainly don't "abuse" my discs either......
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Aug 2007
Colorado
|
![]()
Overall I'm also pleased with the coating. However, I did get a used copy of Ratchet and Clank that was perfect until almost the end of the game, then it started getting glitchy. If the disc does have scratches, smaller scratches make a bigger difference on Blu-Ray...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
I'm absolutely convinced it was a key reason Blockbuster when Blu so early. They used a "for the consumer" argument to justify their move, but I believe it was really dollars and sense for there bottom line. I notice Disney is starting to mention it more. It will be a huge factor for parents' moving to Blu. Gary |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I am a huge fan of Blu-ray Disc's coating
![]() I have had copies of Blade Runner and now Bonnie and Clyde (oddly enough both Warner Bros.) where the underlying disc has had scratches that must have occurred before the coating was applied. These type of scratches concern me greatly for two reasons, one because of the density of data packed onto a Blu-ray Disc even a small scratch can cause serious playback issues, and two if the imperfection is under the coating you certainly can buff it off, etc. That said, the coating is generally a real positive, as opposed to some HD DVDs I've seen where it looks like it came off a steel wool line rather than a HD DVD one. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Banned
Mar 2008
|
![]() Quote:
While I'm by nature always weary of product claims like "coating" and such as a consumer because basically I don't trust anything until its tested, seeing the steel-wool test and now having my own anecdotal experience with it, I'm now sold completely on disc coating and it certainly made me feel even better about Blu ray winning the format war. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Moderator
|
![]()
If the BD structure had been closer to DVD, then they very likely wouldn't have added the hard coat. It wasn't something they would have likely added just for consumer friendliness.
But, the only way to get the BD density was moving the data layer to near the surface. This allowed the better NA, allowing a finer spot, and thus permitting the higher density. FYI: A better PRML and even finer focus would have allowed even higher densities. The TDK 100GB and 200GB recordable prototypes use three and six layers: 33.33GB per layer instead of 25GB. The data layers of BD are maximum 0.1mm deep. In BD50 the second data layer is at 0.075mm. More layers would be even closer to the surface. Although, they may reduce the L0/L1 separator somewhat too. Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
The coating is nice, but it doesn't offer complete protection. I received Enemy of the State BD and it was loose inside and had several scratches. It's still good to know it's on there.
What I do like is if a BD comes with a smudge, it can easily be wiped off by a microfiber cloth and look brand new. I have had to wipe off fingerprints or other markings on dvds and scratches would be left after doing so. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I have to agree with all you guys. The stores don't want to bother with returning scratched discs from transit. Hard coating practically ends transit damage.
When I decided I wanted blu-ray I was concerned about the damage scratches would do at those recording densities. Hard coating sold me. I hope they keep improving it. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Movie Props | Home Theater General Discussion | GodSpeed | 4 | 01-26-2009 02:58 AM |
Disc coating underrated! | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | wingnut0021 | 46 | 03-16-2008 04:21 AM |
Props for Amazon- Good Customer Service | General Chat | Skillz5 | 3 | 11-28-2007 08:18 PM |
Giving props to Disney! (USA Today article) | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | WriteSimply | 51 | 08-16-2007 09:06 PM |
Props to our own Chris Beveridge! | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Musashi | 11 | 04-26-2007 04:21 AM |
|
|